For forever now, people have constantly associated women with nature. People often describe the earth as “Mother Earth” and often use female pronouns when discussing the earth (her trees, she’s hurting, etc..). In the readings, I can see many connections being made between the oppression of women and nature. For one, Gebara goes into detail about how ecofeminists and intersectional feminists will discuss ideas about the world but while they’re doing this, our world is being destroyed along with women and children. “While all these discussions are going on, the destruction of the Amazon forest, the rain forest, and others continue… lots of paper is being used, lots of trees are being cut down and used by industries, polluting the rivers and the air… lots of women and children are starving and dying with diseases produced by a capitalist system able to destroy lives and keep profit for only a few.” (Gebara). The problem is not talking about these theories, it’s talking about them and trying to understand them while lives are being destroyed at the exact same time. Gebara explains how different groups of women in Latin America are tasking themselves to provide a new order of meaning including marginalized people. “The option for the poor is an option for life. Our goals should be to build a world where poor and marginalized people have a place to live with peace and integrity. We know that without this option we are not building a world with justice and love” (Gebara). We have to respect nature and all living beings or we will never find peace, “we choose to die by our own bad decisions” (Gebara).
In the Speak Truth to Power reading, they explained that women in Africa are the ones who interact with nature on a daily basis. Because of this, the women can tell when their food is full of pollutants and impurities (Maathai). In direct response to these problems, Wangari Maathai founded the Green Belt Movement in 1977, this is meant to encourage farmers to plant “Green Belts”, as it would “stop soil erosion, provide shade, and create a source of lumber and firewood” (Maathai). Today, “the movement has planted over fifteen million trees, produced income for eighty thousand people in Kenya alone, and has expanded its efforts to over thirty African countries, the United States, and Haiti” (Maathai).
I absolutely agree that disempowerment and environmental degradation are behind the material deprivations and cultural losses of the marginalized and the poor. Marginalized groups aren’t able to get resources and things they need to better themselves/their communities and environment because the greater populace is dismissive of them and doesn’t allow people who they view as “below them” to change things for the better.
Works Cited:
Gebara, Ivone. “Ecofeminism: A Latin American Perspective.” Cross Currents , vol. 53, no. 1, 2003. Arts Premium Collection, search-proquest-com.libproxy.umassd.edu/docview/214936990/abstract/1516EEDAA5CD464DPQ/1?accountid=14573.
Maathai, Wangari. “Key Speeches & Articles: Speak Truth to Power.” The Green Belt Movement, 4 May 2000, www.greenbeltmovement.org/wangari-maathai/key-speeches-and-articles/speak-truth-to-power.